Internet Publication 2002
Presenter: Alan Gourley The world is on the verge of the greatest human tragedy ever known, www.themindweb.com
Our odyssey is a journey to discover how we have been deceived and how we can recover our independence. Those who skip-read – or hurriedly pigeon-hole uncomfortable information into those little "I know" mind boxes, will never learn. Should this mean you, open your mind, don't waste your time. The article below is divided into twelve chapters. Do not assume that these are independent, they are just convenient rest breaks, opportunities to mull over. Early comment will be supported, progressively, as this presentation proceeds. When we are manipulated to live by false beliefs we become incompetent in management of our lives and slaves to those who create our beliefs. Although it is very important to expose what is going on behind the scenes, exposure, as you will see, is not enough – we need to know both the "mind and method" of manipulation if we are to achieve our freedom. We need to know that we are enslaved by philosophy backed by law and we need to look at life from a wider perspective. Our real tragedy is that, because the poison pills of deceit are sweet, very few want to face the danger of our situation; this is why the bars in mind work. Nevertheless, I am confident that, if we read with a desire for truth (even though truth at first seems remote or incredible) many may save themselves. For those who have the discipline, enterprise and courage to face the truth the evidence is clear and overwhelming. What is hidden, and what few know, is that we have been living within the confines of contrived belief systems called ideologies. Belief in these make of us servants; this, to the extent that we will kill and risk our lives for the benefit of our masters – worse, it deforms our human evelopment. Evidence will include recent comment from a past Deputy Prime Minister of Canada and Professor John McMurtry: author of “A Manifesto of Corporate Totalitarianism", along with other knowledgeable or, behind the scenes people, from distant past to present. - Contents Chapter 1 The world is in the grip of slavery by belief! Today this slavery is more oppressive and inescapable than at any previous time in known history, and the reason for this stronger hold is because those who exercise power use it with the benefit of scientific understanding of human behaviour. Enslavement has a long history and, as you may recall, comment by Jesus of Nazareth shows He understood slavery by belief. This may have been the first time it was so recognised and mentioned in public. John 8:31-35 Today, as 2000 years ago, we still do not want to believe that we are slaves. Pride and prejudice may blind us to reality but today there is surely a better understanding of social organisation. Certainly there is evidence accessible to those who look for it. Perhaps, of even more importance, is that we may now see how vital it is that we know the truth of our restricted vision and how personally disastrous it will be if we ignore this truth. Slavery by physical force is primitive. Slavery by belief is also very old but instils in the minds of people that they are free. For example: we know that what we are paid to do also profits others. Paid labour does not mean slavery but it does provide the mind with a very secure foundation for a conviction of freedom; this makes it easier for despots to put enslaving beliefs into the undefended mind. Slavery by belief has now become more purposefully used and is made vastly more efficient by modern social research, science and technology. Note: These articles relate, in principle, to the entire human world. Parts may seem mundane (caring people should already know) nevertheless this is a real life/death situation. We need to use all the logic at our command to understand the true meaning of the evidence and we would not need this wake-up call if we were alert to the real world rather than living in a mind-sedated dream that is rapidly becoming a nightmare. - Contents Chapter 2: "Well I think the word development' is rather obscene. Development in biology means an organism unfolds harmoniously in its environment. It means that the flower becomes a fruit, or the embryo becomes a child. But the social sciences have taken over this concept and perverted it. When we say 'development' in the modern sense, we generally mean outside intervention and meddling. If you meddle too much with an organism, it will be damaged or will die, which is precisely, I think, what we've been doing with other people's lives. I think development has failed largely because the assumptions that underlay the whole concept were absolutely false." [I would like you to remember those words: we are now, deliberately, taught important social assumptions that are absolutely false. On economic manipulation she had the following to say:] "All these institutions are centralised, hierarchical, completely undemocratic and working with a lot of money contributed by their members, mostly their richer members. What do they do with that money? Well, in many ways they are helping to subjugate all the economies of the world and making them satellites of 'free enterprise " so to speak. ... So the World Bank is in charge of imposing this economic doctrine, the International Monetary Fund is in charge of imposing structural adjustment, in other words austerity programs in the Third World, and GATT is involved with indeed reducing not only barriers to trade but any standards – environmental standards, health standards, high wages – that could be considered impediments to trade. I feel very much that the undemocratic nature of these institutions will mean that a whole New World Order is put into place and that it is an anti-democratic, authoritarian order run by the elite's of the rich world on their behalf”. End quote. Worth reading again. This lady is not afraid to tell the truth and we will do well to remember it as we find new evidence increasingly supports it. But it is best I limit quotes to keep this as digestible as possible while still explaining points sufficiently to make them clear. If I fail you may never believe that Globalism wants your world and is prepared to remove your intellectual competence in order to achieve that end. The first TOTAL war of history is a war of the mind. We start at the shallow end! - Contents Chapter 3: A common victim was is the farming community (groups picked off, one by one) deregulation to improve efficiency – lower prices – make us more competitive! The same globalisation lies – we have heard them before – we have seen their results. Is it not strange that these advocates of globalisation always forget to mention the number of people that will be put out of productive work and how this is disguised by placing some of them in non-productive work? i.e. Timber workers become forest wardens; office workers may be employed working out taxes owed under increasingly complicated tax systems; factory workers become servants to tourists enticed to visit because the poor work for low reward; and so on (these 'make-work' jobs devalue our money and often get in the way of productive work). Do they ever tell us that those still employed will be taxed to pay for additional family and unemployed relief? We, the people, pay for our own enslavement and taxes are already extremely high. We then pay higher service prices because of reduced efficiency and reduction in useful production while our national wealth drifts away. Do we see how rich nations are becoming poor nations? Do we ever see it mentioned that when we buy good quality imports the price matches or exceeds what we used to pay for our good local products which now, because our market has been taken away, can no longer be economically produced? It is now not practical to own slaves but it is OK to go to some country where people are so poor that they will do anything for a subsistence pay. This form of slavery is more efficient and people will buy rubbish if it is sold cheaper than the local product. Are we ever told that foreign bargains (sold by Globalists for high profits) are a product of economic slavery; a direct but more efficient substitute for owned slaves? Are we ever told that when we buy goods (produced by people who are forced by necessity to work for a pittance) we ourselves, in fact, then become slave users? Globalisation is the directive, and beneficiary, of this modern form of physical slavery (poverty enforced labour). But always remember; Globalism does not work for money it works to enslave your mind, control your wealth and have power over the user of your body. So local producers increasingly have this choice – go broke or, if they can afford it, do what the Globalists have done and take their manufacturing to a slave labour country. But how can we keep buying imports when so many live on pensions or do non-productive work and our country is not producing enough of real value to pay its way? The answer is a combination of gradualism and Hegelian Dialectic (the socialist principles for social subversion): value of our pay gradually declines; governments sell national assets and borrow money from the international moneylenders. Hospitals, education and public services degenerate or become impossibly expensive. In this way the true costs of using overseas slaves to supply our needs may remain hidden for many years but the nation is gradually getting poorer while the people more confused and frustrated by divide and conquer. We cannot understand what is happening – we become economically apathetic and devote ourselves to sport – entertainment – drugs – or the ideological religion called humanism: all just as our internationally planned philosophy and attitudes are designed to achieve. In the end our nation will become just another slave nation where we work for a bowl of soup and lack understanding of the technology that will destroy us. So farmers who are fortunate enough to have the best land and situation are forced, like other industries before them, to work for a pittance, the less fortunate go bankrupt and internationals applaud as they watch their dreams materialise! Do not be fooled to believe that only the rural sector is under attack or that money is what this is all about, or that political confidence trickery is new or that all who promote world government know what they are doing; the blind lead the blind. A quote from “ The portable Emerson” Penguin. First published in 1841. Quote: “ The farmer imagines power and place are fine things. But the President has paid dearly for his White House. It has commonly cost him all his peace, and the best of his manly attributes. To preserve for a short time so conspicuous an appearance before the world, he is content to eat dust before the real masters who stand erect behind the throne .” End Q. Greed for POWER is not new! Today the aim is the achievement of total power to own the world as a Globalist domain. Those who produce wealth lose, the people are impoverished, while governments give handouts of our money to keep us believing that our good government is trying to help us. They deceive, divide and rob the community (in pretence of efficiency and international welfare) but its purpose is to benefit Globalist plans. * [*Note: This war is undeclared because a very small number cannot expect to win a fair fight against a very large number; it is secret because, if the large number knows it is being attacked, the attack can be defeated. Economic disasters, diseases, political mistakes, are naturally possible; when deliberately introduced to cause public distress these can always be disguised as natural events.] This dirty war would, by the UN's own definition, have to be classed as genocide (the deliberate destruction of national or ethnic cultures) though always made to appear otherwise by pretending support for the smaller to weaken the larger. In our deceived state we may think that the internationals would want everyone working productively but mechanisation and technology now mean that there are too many workers and too much industrial waste. So why do they not reduce working hours and working years and encourage people to a more relaxed and more enlightened way of life? A very human solution; but Globalism is not human and the power and pride bound up in plans for deceit and enslavement denies humanity as an intelligent concern. Should we ask ourselves: WHY HAVE WE – people of all advanced nations – SURRENDERED TO CRIME? - Contents Chapter 4: This has resulted in an ecological disaster that will take years to fix and which cannot be fixed by the debt ridden farm sector alone. The reason I mention this is to show that enslavement by lies and deceit has ramifications that enter the very soul of community; it is not just community robbery. Every economic, social and moral aspect of civilised community gradually becomes deformed and self-destructive. We are not told that biological life is designed to an order of principles of construction; biological mechanisms represent biological engineering, therefore human life (culture, economy, morality) works best if lived in accord with these principles; misuse is destructive of human potential. Globalism attempts to create a world to a private plan! For culture to advance we need an increasingly disciplined, more responsible, more moral community. Globalism wants to create a world of disposable people who become less disciplined, less human and their way to do this is to mislead the general community about basic social understanding – even the very existence of intelligent creation is denied. Third world farmers are encouraged to grow crops for export to the rich. Those who can afford it then buy imported food, for the rest the import is of famine, poverty, disease war and death. WHO is killing Africa? In the past national leaders needed people to defend them against their neighbours and so had a vested interest in community health and strength but, to Globalism, nationalism is dangerous. Disaster relief is always provided – when the worst is over! What is happening is not happening because of administrative ignorance. We, the people (those who do not serve a use in Globalist plans) now become the enemy, an international army will fill the bodyguard need. International government – Globalisation – does not need you, or me, or small business; they want to own all means of production; a goal that is now largely achieved and, in the end, they plan that production will serve their needs alone. A great many of us are already doing non-productive work or living on government hand-outs. If WE DO NOT CARE ENOUGH to care for ourselves how long will it be before most remaining productive workers are replaced by technology? Why then would Globalists carry us as useless and (to them) dangerous baggage? What use is it to complain about Globalist greed? Why would they take notice of us except to throw us crumbs while they steal the bread? The way to defeat them is to take responsibility for our own lives and expose the goals of Globalism. It may not be easy but the way to freedom is still an open road. A great kaleidoscope of evidence points to the danger we face; shall we gamble the future of humanity that the evidence is wrong? - Contents Chapter 5: Unfortunately, for this to happen, we have to face (what cannot be intelligently denied) that our government is NOT democratic and is not "OUR" government and, in fact, that "Party Government" is an elitist designed and owned instrument of "world government". They tell us we must vote for them because "it is democracy"! But it is not democracy because, before we choose our preferred liars, the teams have already been chosen by manipulation agents – almost all candidates on offer are people so ignorant and egotistical that the internationals can easily control them. Is it not obvious? The internationals support people who are greedy for power but incompetent – they choose egocentric people and supply Globalist advisers. Were the parliament chosen by lottery we would get a more competent national team? The party system was introduced to England in the reign of Charles II (1630-85) after 300 years of non-party government by what became known as the "Model Parliament". Then began the struggle for power that is now reaching its climax as a world dictatorship. Parties were not an original part of any democratic system or constitution (Britain, USA and Australia included). It is not possible for "party system" government to be democratic. An Australian quote may be helpful, let's hear it from an ex-Labor Party MP. Barry Cohen, in an article in " The Australian " (6/4/1992); Quote: " ... as I sat down and heard the PM snarl a welcome "Get on with it. " I realised something was amiss. Seated slightly to the rear of himself, the treasurer, the minister for finance et al, was a phalanx of grey-faced, grey-suited strangers. To this day, I have no idea who they were. I was, however, to learn quickly what they were. … I was informed ... they had been seconded from government departments, the private sector and universities within minutes of the government taking office. … the key people in the PM's office who had to be convinced first. It was a waste of time going to the Prime Minister and convincing him if the minute you left the minders gave it the thumbs down. It is and was outrageous but I doubt it will ever change whether the government is Labor or Liberal." End quote. Look and listen Agreed, it will never change, it can never change, so long as party system government remains in place! The party is governed by a behind-scenes administration and even the National Constitution, the true law of the land, is not respected. How could it be otherwise when the party system itself is unconstitutional both by its moral nature and all democratic values? In Australia it even contravenes the "Crimes Act" ; 28; quote: Is it not clear that if 'your' political representative is a member of a party then your representative is pressured to support the party even if this is against a member's own best judgement and opposed to the political duty of representing the electorate? Therefore 'your' representative is not your representative but, he represents those that chose him. You may say we do have a democratic choice of party! Yes we do, but party members – establishment ruled – are loyal to those who choose to offer them power! If we cannot honestly face this, then all our effort and resistance creates a public picture that implies political legitimacy. It tells the silent majority that we have a legitimate democracy and also lets our enemy know that we really do not understand what is happening and that he has us securely in his web of deceit. Who does the political party represent? When Disraeli said, "the world" he no doubt meant “the world of European peoples”. To understand our present political culture it is essential we understand this Disraeli insight. There was, and is, a hidden government behind the apparent government: “party members” represent those who offer them an opportunity for power. You have very little chance of being elected unless you are first chosen to represent one or other of the main parties: and the people who do the choosing do so on behalf of world government. As you have little chance of being elected or of influencing events unless you are chosen to represent a party it is those who offer power who have power, not those who do the electing. New parties either fail or become infiltrated before they can gain useful power. Our election choice only decides which party will serve the establishment. In other words our 'choice' is a Hegelian confidence trick just to make us believe we have a choice. There are pages of quotes from honest and eminent people in these books to back up a lifetime of research. I could quote many more but know that it is not so much a matter of evidence as of whether we want to know the truth; if we don't want to face our fantasies then we refuse conviction by any amount of evidence; it's as simple as that. But, whatever we may want to believe – political parties are not there to represent the people. It should be self-evident that, ultimately, it is we, the people, who are responsible for our own enslavement – we are not overwhelmed by numbers, our numbers make us supremely powerful – it is not the law, the law requires our freedom! It is so comforting to believe the law is enforced – so comforting to know we have the numbers and right to enforce it – so comforting to believe we are free that we allow despots to enslave us. It is so comforting to believe we do not need to defend our heritage that we hide behind our delusions and hate the whistle blowers. Oh yes, we allow ourselves to be enslaved; we allow the enslavement of our children and of our grandchildren. So long as we pay mercenaries to take care of us, then they will make of us their slaves. At first they ignore the law, once certain that they can get away with this they can change to the law – if they need to. They use us and abuse us and will, when we become too much of a pollutant in their world, have us destroy each other by means that they have us design, pay for and use. We will fight to defend our leaders and kill each other. Have you wondered why there are so many new diseases appearing? The evidence does not always support that these are chance events. We cry – they laugh! We beg – they despise us! Do we not deserve our fate? Why are we afraid? There are still, in the world, people so principled that they will, (as did our ancestors) face death for community freedom – we beg when all we need do is support our legal heritage. If we can just overcome our implanted conceits, sufficient to understand and admit that we are slaves only because we fear to take responsibility for choice of our own political representatives – cheaper and easier than party elections – then we will find ourselves worthy of freedom. Violence! No! At this stage we do not have to, and should not, use violence! Violence without understanding plays into Globalist hands! We can build public understanding progressively. We have people who are concerned and are of proven competence in management. These people do not seek public power but (if asked and backed by a significant representation) would, take on a serving role. [Note please that important word – if "ASKED". We must NOT ask for volunteers or employ a professional management company, (a self-interest party). The self-opinionated are selfish managers?] Organised political parties – independents who beg for our support – most are egomaniacs who want to run our lives and can't run their own – people who are not traitors but who, in blind ignorance of consequences, sell their nation to feed their egomania. Do we need ever-more examples of politician greed and stupidity? We should not accept those who contend for power and position but should choose people from our community who are of proven competence and common concern; ask these to manage group affairs. When good people see that they have a popular mandate for honest government enough will take up the challenge. If we can gain confidence to take the vital step to political independence we then, thereby, open for ourselves the way to truth and freedom. - Contents Chapter 6: Very few of us have given the Globalist power structure, and the manner of its progress over the years, much thought – we (brainwashed) prefer to leave thinking to the political mercenaries we pay to take care of us. Few of us have any understanding of what this (secretly developed plan) will mean to the human race should it become fully implemented. How many suspect that this "New World Order" is a planned oligarchy? Were it not planned for the benefit of the few then the plan would, at its beginning, have been openly displayed for public consideration and support. How many see signs that a world enslaved to an ideological idea (where the establishment controls education and will itself have an education that is quite different to that given the 'common people') is a disaster in progress? How many have noticed that, in discussions of human behaviour, the words 'training' and 'education' have replaced "understanding" and "enlightenment"? You are no longer expected to understand "right or wrong" "good or bad"; the concept of "truth" is being educated out – truth is not supposed to have meaning for us 'common people': good – bad – truth – we are told, are just personal preferences. This is a conceit we are indoctrinated to believe. It is pleasing to the young and ignorant. But let us not be fooled; only by facing the truth can we ever become free. If you cannot believe some would be so deceitful, so inhuman, to their own kind you have learned nothing from history. Here is what resent Australian MP and leader of the opposition, Kim Beazley, had to say ( The Australian 28/8/1997): quote: “ I believe these things are done incrementally. You prepare a public mind, a public attitude; you create an acceptance of the unacceptable – at least the unacceptable at this point of time.” E Q. Or you cannot believe that they are trying to teach your children that there is no truth! Listen to Dame Leonie Kramer, Chancellor of Sydney University ( Courier Mail 12/911997): quote: “ You have to deal with the fact that there are plenty of people in the world now who will tell you that you mustn't use the word truth, as there's no such thing. I think that way, madness lies.” E Q. How many see that enslavement of the "common mind" to false social concepts is to create a common-mind confusion and social divisions that will defeat common cause? It is a policy of “confuse divide and conquer"; it protects 'the masters'? Were there no masters there would be no need for deceit and no need for emotion driven ideology. Who are the unknown people who direct the plans of the 'United Nations'? Have you any idea who does set policy guidelines for the UN? Do you think it is the member governments? From where do they get their instructions? Has anyone ever heard arguments put forward in parliament for the hugely complicated, Globalist plan – are there any records of this discussion in Government records? Do you really believe that representatives from a number of governments would ever agree about, or, on their own, even think of such a program? 'Party political' vision and concern doesn't reach beyond the next election. How and why would they secretly work out details of a plan covering generations if not supervised and fed pieces of a hidden agenda to work to? By always giving supporters a small piece of the agenda it can be made to look like a step to benefit community. If you cannot believe party politicians would, or could, create plans for world government and implement without public discussion, then you are right. It is known to those who want to know, that the governments of the world, especially those calling themselves democracies, have long been ruled by an invisible government. If you see division between national leaders and the UN know that both serve the same unseen hand and look for deceit that is planned. We only need to listen to something like a 'greenhouse emissions' debate to see that party politicians cannot plan co-operatively when not under instructions; (they are only instructed when matters directly effect Globalist plans; to Globalists 'greenhouse' at present serves both a socially divisive and economically draining campaign and maintenance of THEIR world). What about all the 'Conventions' and other ‘social directives' material produced by the United Nations? Example: “ The Convention of the Rights of the Child” : A casual reading gives an impression of support for traditional family values such as Article 14: “ States Parties shall respect the rights and duties of parents ... to provide direction to the child...” Article 18 gives parents' primary responsibility for the child's upbringing and development. However, these are undermined. So the child is given rights to live a private life that is secret and outside of parental guidance. The 'good' part of the Convention is unnecessary. It just states what all civilised countries take as natural, therefore it is the 'subversive' rights that are the purpose of the 'rights' and are the ‘rights' that WILL be enforced. These are the parts that give ‘authorities' rights to corrupt the child mind and law to protect them while they do it. The rest, mere camouflage, as many parents of teenage children find to their distress. How many suspect that a world owned by an oligarchy or plutocracy will result in a severe reduction in world population? Can we not see that they do not want THEIR resources wasted; or the threat of massive rebellion; nor do they want the pollution now created in service to the common mass? (About 90% of people are now, not just of no value to the Globalists, but a menace.) Why do we believe the rich and powerful care about the common mass? Do cigarette makers, brewers or casino operators care what happens to their customers? Do governments ever hesitate to involve us in war? It is very depressing (now that so much evidence is available) to find that activists cannot bring themselves to face that government does not govern by the law of the Constitution – that law is now no more than what those given the power to enforce it – decide. Why do so many close their eyes to the reality that government does not work for communal advancement, defence and prosperity – that education is no longer designed to encourage moral values, social enlightenment, human progress and satisfaction. That law is no longer designed to deliver justice or protect the innocent – that health services are no longer designed, primarily, to benefit the health, comfort and long life of the people. Why have social activists learned nothing from the last twenty years – or even the last two thousand? Why do people who well know the reality of law, party corruption and finance, still mob the streets to tell leaders what leaders know better than they? (When we try to explain 'bad' government to quislings we are playing footsies with a nest of vipers and helping lead the great silent majority to the belief that we have legal government. Will we forever be seduced to avoid our responsibilities and ignore the lessons of our past? - Contents Chapter 7: To break down remaining independence was imperative! Scientific study of human behaviour and human weakness was essential; (the essence of that program is told in "Globalism Brainwash". A significant statement now from the featured Edward Bernays who, early in the last century, was leading the new science, “Public Relations”. * Quote: “ The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our government. “We are governed, our minds moulded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is the logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organised.” EQ, *Note: “ Public Relations” such a nice ‘mother love' name for "people control/slavery". It is as George Orwell said: hate will be called love – war will be called peace. Orwell was an awakened communist. You may be interested to know that Bernays was not exposing the corruption of humanity, he was proud of what he was doing. Was he correct in saying that: “This is the logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organised” ? He was, but only so long as we understand that 'our democratic society' is a fake democratic society, a society controlled by despots. A true democratic society could never be organised in this way, what is being done was planned – it had to be secret because it is neither democratic nor for the public good. In 1976 Bertrand Russell “ The Impact of Science on Society” was able to safely reveal that education was aiming to impress such ideals and concepts on the child mind that “ after pupils have left school, they will be incapable … of thinking or acting otherwise than their schoolmasters would have wished.” He could say that openly; there was no outcry because the public mind was already programmed to see this truth as too incredible to believe. Statements such as the above should prove to those who seek to expose Globalist plans in conventional ways are wasting their time. Globalism is in control; for effective action we must both expose and clearly explain. Why do human societies grow, disintegrate and collapse? May it not be safely assumed that they are more or less successful because of the degree of truth and error in their beliefs? In our situation the cracks will quickly widen, the money confidence trick will collapse and the great prostituted commercial system will disintegrate with vast, world-wide, violence and suffering; but only if we let it come to that. As mentioned, control of human behaviour by control of human belief is not new, it has been practised, to some extent, for about as far back as written evidence can take us. As an example consider this quote from “ Indian Philosophy” by Radhakrishnan. Quote: Well, as those who want to can see for themselves, it is already evident that the new religion (intended for the creation of the new human 'profane') is to be a form of humanistic nature worship. Once fully established then the slave class can be led to believe that the elite are a superior evolutionary form and that needed slaves are fortunate to have these superior beings there to take care of them. Slavery to belief is the most effective form of slavery known but, to impose it, you have to be more egotistic than clever and more brutal than moral. These people are neither mentally nor morally superior. You see, what the elitists know, and the consequences of which they have always been careful to keep from the clear understanding of the public, is that we all tend to try to act in accordance with what we believe to be true. If you can convince people of lies then they will act to your agenda. Obvious is it not? It is common sense – we need the truth to make useful decisions – decisions based on lies are not likely to give the results we desire but will suit, very well, the plans of those who tell us the lies. How very, very thin the bars limiting our perceptions! As is so often said: there is not much that is new under the sun. The first step to creating a new set of social beliefs is to create a confusion of beliefs. We are educated to dislike challenge to our comfortable beliefs! During the last century, to a confusion of scientific discoveries, were added many challenges: talk of subliminal messages – drugs in the water supply – foreign troops stationed on our soil – victimless crimes – there is no truth – fluoride toothpaste for sedation – God is dead – creation by evolution and so on. What are you to believe when the facts are hidden? So, when faced with confusion, we normally turn to what we want to believe, and what we want to believe is certainly NOT that we are enslaved by the exciting beliefs and attitudes encouraged by government institutions and ceaselessly promoted through the mass media. TV has been a wonderful aid to the Globalists. * *Note: It seems now almost compulsory that fictional TV must contain sex and violence; also to advertise this by promoting it as 'adult'. A ploy to entice adolescent minded people and children to watch and act out their fantasies. Being lazy is nice – taking drugs is fun – disobeying parents and (old) authorities is exciting – being immoral is great. So we clamour for more of the poison: more mis-education; more entertainment; more sport, less social discipline. The highest accolade we can bestow on the propaganda experts is that we beg for more. The hooks in the public mind are scientifically set and who wants to think about what they might gain from reality. (Have we not been taught that there is no truth – no reality?) If there is no truth how can life be wasted? Without truth, cruelty or kindness, good or bad – all is meaningless myth and make-believe, but! How can that be true if there is no truth? Machiavelli (1469-1527). Quote: “ One of the great secrets of the day is to know how to take possession of popular prejudices and passions in such a such a way as to introduce a confusion of principles which make impossible all understanding between those who the same language and have the same interests.” E Q. TRUTH is FREEDOM – deceit means enslavement. Slavery – The New World Order – exciting isn't it? - Contents Chapter 8: “Well, the process has reached the point where Lewis Lapham, editor Harpers Magazine, says the U.S. has two governments: the permanent and the provisional. The permanent government consists of the Fortune 500 magazine's largest companies, also the largest law firms and public relations firms in Washington that work for those companies, and the top bureaucrats, both civil and military and they're the permanent government.” “Then there is what they call an election every once in a while and they elect the provisional government and they elect actors that come on stage and read the script written by the permanent government.” E Q. He also comments: "Does it sound familiar? Does it ring a bell? The answer is Quigley. Remember? Way back in 1966 he said that in the US every four years the people – and by that word he meant the masses, the rabble, the hoi polloi, us – could vent their spleen by 'kicking the rascals out' without really having any effect on policy direction. Are people slowly waking up?” E.Q. From a speech by the Honourable Paul Hellyer at the “Save Canada Conference” held in Ottawa August 20-21, 1999. Source email, but this talk was also on Australian ABC. radio. Quigley (an insider) wrote a large book called “ Tragedy and Hope” ; published in 1966 by Macmillan; N.Y. Like Bernays, what he reveals is revealed in pride, not anger. I don't have to read it, there is more than enough evidence for what is happening, but it is said to be very revealing of world government at that time. "Are people really waking up" or has our will for freedom been already drained from us? The evidence of mind manipulation is enormous, but is only meaningful to those who know that truth is essential for their own beneficial decision-making. These are people who have the courage and self-discipline to suppress pride, arrogance, selfishness and/or prejudice to achieve a predominately unbiased viewpoint for their defence and to benefit their culture and their families. The point is that those capable of awakening can still do a lot to save themselves should the majority deliver themselves to termination. Do not, for one minute, think that I am revealing plans that have been kept secret rather than secretive; evidence has been widely available throughout the world. I cannot reveal all the evidence, there is just too much of it, but there is here, in this treatise, enough evidence to alert and awaken intelligent people who want to make sense of what is happening and save themselves. The secret that Globalists do not reveal is the precise science of manipulation here exposed. For spiritual confirmation download the equally exposing, “Of TRUTH” . You could almost say that the establishment has been at pains to have their plans revealed. Perhaps it is just that God protects those who reveal the truth – or perhaps, after all, there is a conscience in even the blackest heart – or perhaps these egotists just like to flaunt their power. Or then again, perhaps they feel the need of an excuse so that if they are ever confronted they could say; “But we never kept what we were doing secret! It was written in books available to the public; it was broadcast over wireless and TV; we did not even stop people reporting – it was told in newspaper articles and privately written literature. “The fact is that people like to be children, they want someone to take care of them. We offered a service and it was accepted! You can't blame us! Certainly we did not allow much publicity. You can't expect us to force people to face the fact of the consequences of giving power over their lives to strangers!” And so on. Even I know that I am not likely to suffer harm from a confident establishment. But beware of petty officialdom. Top brass are very confident that the majority cannot see reason and that most who do, fear to tell the truth. All considered, it is likely the 'whistle blowers' greater danger is that the general public may hate, with such passion, as to murder those who try to force them to face the truth. * *Note: Example: the Crucifixion: Pilate found no case against Jesus but the crowd shouted – crucify. To better understand why a large number of people would want to crucify those who try to help them, we might refer to a philosopher from ancient Greece. Plato (I think) explained that if people were bound so that they saw only shadows on a wall they would, in time, come to believe that the shadows were the reality. If then, you tell them that the shadows were only shadows, they will laugh at you; should you persist in trying to force them see the truth they would turn on you and try to kill you. Escapism still rules and we now live in a world of TV shadows and cultural lies. The reason for such behaviour is that people have been seduced to excessive pride and deceived about the need for truth: we are mentally bound to believe in shadows and see ourselves as the beliefs we live by. In this situation an attack on core beliefs is personal – to accept correction means accepting that our lives, to this point, have been based on delusions. We overcome this problem if we realise that the most basic nature of life, is truth. Truth is the ordering and discipline of chaos; without truth in the order of things there is no life. A move closer to truth, a self-discipline at any age, is a move toward reality. Unfortunately, educated to self-righteousness, many are overcome by the emotion of imagined great loss – they must fight for their beliefs – they will not think clearly to see that truth brings reality (true meaning) and great comfort to their living. - Contents Chapter 9: Human life has never had better opportunities but the world is becoming filled with violence, misery, futility, frustration and selfish greed because people are making life decisions based on false beliefs? Has the choice between the creation of life by chance and the creation of life by intelligence been very carelessly or very skilfully, misrepresented? The choice between religions based on these two opposing concepts is too important to human survival to be left to persuasion by vested interests. Intelligent research and unbiased judgement is needed! The fate of life on earth is in the balance! Science and Creation Science says that mathematics is the ultimate proof of any concept. Is it interesting that mathematics is not a widely encouraged subject in today's education; I offer for intelligence three sources of mathematical support: 1) Sir Fred Hoyle and associate C. Wickramasinghe, in their book: “ Evolution from space” , say; quote: “… there are about two thousand enzymes, and the chance of obtaining them all in a random trial … is an outrageously small probability that could not be faced even if the whole universe consisted of organic soup.” They go on to say of evolution theory: “ If one is not prejudiced either by social beliefs or by a scientific training into the conviction … this simple calculation wipes the idea entirely out of court.” End quote. 2) Dr H.B. Holroyd Ph.D., “Quest for Valid Economics” a mechanical engineer and physicist, and retired head of the Department of Physics, Augustana College, USA tells us that the Darwinian error was caused by human sloth and the failure to use necessary mathematics. Holroyd claims that the design of life by chance is nonsense. Quote: And: 3) Giovanni Blandino S.J. in his book “Theories on the Nature of life” says. Quote: “ Summing up, we may say: In the hypothesis of equiprobability, the probability that a regular structure should form, either by generation or by gradual evolution, is equal to the probability that the same structure should form immediately from matter irregularly arranged (Principle of invariableness of probabilities).” EQ. Mathematical evidence does conclusively deny the possibility of creation by chance, but let us go the extra mile! What does intelligent logic and the evidence of those old bones have to say? Norman Macbeth (author of “Darwin Retried”) is of the opinion that Chance Creation is no more than a mishmash of escapism and confusion. Original Darwinism was found faulty by top scientists and even dogmatic evolutionists replaced it with something called the 'Synthetic Theory'. In a 1983 interview he makes these comments. Quote: "But a much deeper and more penetrating analysis of the problem was put together by Professor R. H. Brady … in the quarterly called "Systematic Zoology " for December 1979 … I think it destroys the idea of natural selection, and this is certainly the opinion of many people at the American Museum of Natural History." EQ. So both mathematics and logic deny (the never scientific) theory of chance and natural selection. The fossil evidence also denies evolution! This was confirmed in October 1980 when some 160 of the world's top anatomists, palaeontologists, evolutionary geneticists, etc., met at what is commonly known as The Chicago Conference. All these experts were forced to admit that the fossil evidence did not support Darwinian evolution and they could find no option other than to fall back on the previously ridiculed “hopeful monster” theory. However this was not admitted into public education or discussion. Clearly it would be dangerous to expose to the public that a theory so important to humanist philosophy as the theory of chance evolution relies on the ‘Hopeful Monster' theory. It would expose chance evolution as childish and collapse humanist philosophy. It would expose humanism as irrelevant to all rational science and undermine Globalist/humanist control of world culture? A fact long accepted by science is that, over time, creatures tend to become specialised and then extinct. The evidence of genetic loss is beyond doubt – the evidence of specialisation is established – but there is no, or only trivial, evidence of genetic creation by chance. If it does occur it is too rare to create new creatures when opposed by the vast natural forces of genetic destruction. * *Note: Natural selection is not disputed, what is disputed is what it does. What it does is work to maintain the efficiency of genetic structures against their erosion by natural forces; were it not for the maintainance value of natural selection living structures would quickly disappear. It does not and cannot create new life-forms. The theory of chance creation is a religion not a scientific theory, but we should also be aware that theist religions do not always logically follow the nature and ideals of their foundations any more than atheist religion (humanism) follows the science it claims as its base. Theist or atheist – all religions reflect, too closely, the desires of their followers, too loosely, the source of their faith. Religions cannot be relied on for authority; the number of religions claiming Christianity demonstrate how human desires bias away from the source claimed as their inspiration. I do not intend to deal here in depth with the Christian Bible but must say that it requires a clinical purity of interpretation. We must become open to truth and not just seek support for human desires. To see the truth we need honesty! We must be aware of the worldly desire to defend pride and prejudice, and a worldly desire to evade responsibility. Those who search for truth have to try to filter out the worldly element that has polluted the words of Jesus and helped the growth of a humanist religion that is promoted by Globalism for human enslavement. “I have not come to bring peace, but a sword” – this is plain intelligence when applied to the situation of bringing truth to a slave world. Truth is the two edged sword that comes out of the mouth. John 14:15-17. “ I am the way I am the truth and I am life; no one comes to the Father except by me” , truth is absolutely basic to life – to the creation of life and to successful human endeavour. That the way to life is through truth is the simple, essential and all embracing revelation. It also reveals that the Creation is intelligence based. When we look without compromise for the words of an advanced being among the words attributed to Jesus, we find them. They are statements not properly understood by the confused population (either then or now) and not wanted by those looking for a ‘big brother' or ‘mummy' because it means taking responsibility for ones own actions. The truth will, indeed, set us free but we must be willing to be truthful and responsible, each for our own life. “ Put not the Lord your God to the test” warns that if we will not defend ourselves – if we leave it to others (even God) to look after us, then we will never be free or know truth. We must accept our responsibilities! We are born with responsibilities, not rights; rights have to be earned. Do not bury your talents! There is truth in the saying, God helps those who help themselves; also those who honestly try. Professor Hoyle, while on a lecture tour of Australia (1982) said: Quote: “ Rejection of Darwinian evolutionary beliefs is crucial to the survival of life on earth. …Once you believe in the evolutionary theory that the weakest go to the wall and that nothing can be done about the selection process, then its an open invitation to the kind of political behaviour we've had over the last century.” EQ. Even more obvious today. Mindless chance creation also goes a long way to explaining the growing despair of the young. Creation by chance – life without future or meaning – has been of great force in the spawning of a culture of drugs, recklessness, suicide, violence, rebelliousness and plainly stupid behaviour among the intelligent young. But the Globalist crime against children does not stop there: another example, among many, is the fact that laws have been introduced, at the demand of the United Nations, to encourage lawlessness! Discipline of children is discouraged! The most effective form of discipline, loving physical punishment, is outlawed even though it is the product of thousands of years of experience and there is no research evidence to support the claimed human benefit of the new, purely emotional, ‘politically correct' mind torment experiment. It seems likely that most investigators of these matters believed, at the beginning, that we were investigating corruption and deceit within our national government. However, when the evidence is assembled it is clear that what we have been looking at is far more treacherous, much bigger, more personal and far older than expected. - Contents Chapter 10: *Note: In Sydney today it is not unusual to see schoolchildren sitting "like doggies" on the pavement. Many people will remember a time when such behaviour would have brought reprimand; we would have been told, "You are not animals." Behaving like animals is now encouraged. Although children have been given 'rights' and encouraged to use them, these rights, along with their teaching, is to encourage children to despise the learning experience of centuries, to be contemptuous of self discipline and to believe it adult to return to the childish freedom of primitive animal behaviour. Does political power protect us or corrupt us? “Drug education: How many parents and citizens do you know who want amoral drug education in their children's schools, or want drugs taking surreptitiously encouraged by information without warning? Did you say none? Well how did this instruction get into this P&C guidebook? The above was a re-quote from my book "Assault on Childhood" (now sold out) so I can tell you that finding out how this became part of a P&C guide book met with some resistance and attempted misinformation. It seems that it was introduced by the “executive"; no record of this drugs policy ever being discussed or voted on could be found in any year book but it was claimed to have been a 'democratic' decision. Of course it was – a democratic decision of the executive! But equally we all should know, and by now accept, that, in the New World Order, 'democracy' does not include the ‘common' people. Every organisation of power is infiltrated by agents of Globalism. We also see that this policy is hidden under health policy and taught under “Personal Development”: i.e. the art of enticing children to make their own decisions based on their own experience (read "in-experience" and meaning "ignore parents".)* *Note: Yes it is natural for children to "grow up" and move away from home so it is not difficult to persuade most parents that a rebellious 14 year old is ‘advanced' and not acting as a result of teaching planned for cultural genocide. As we have seen, reality is something we do not want to face. Public education is controlled by government; is it possible that OUR government could deliberately encourage degeneracy? Could OUR government encourage immoral attitudes – pornographic depravity – anti-social behaviour? An example of how deliberately hard core pornography was ‘smuggled' into the Australian culture is found in “ The report of the Joint Select Committee on Video Material” Vol. l. Canberra l988, p15-17; quote: “The document raised for consideration the question of whether the policy announced by the Attorney-General should be brought fully and immediately into effect or by stages. It stated. 'You would need to have regard to repercussions in the electorate, the Australian public is notoriously conservative, whatever its political affiliations'. “The Government's policy might best be achieved by a strategy of hastening slowly – gradually broadening the standards of imported material so that public opinion can be developed to embrace the principles embodied in the policy'.” EQ. Could a plan for the deliberate subversion of human morals be stated more clearly? Remember the earlier quote of Kim Beasley , “You create an acceptance of the unacceptable” Recall also how they tell us that mass media does not create public opinion; it only follows. How comfortable they are with deceit – how barefaced they lie! The above program started at least as far back as 1973 when the Attorney-General announced as a policy on censorship that: “ federal laws to conform with the general principles that adults should be entitled to read, hear and view what they wished in private and in public and that persons – and those in their care – be not exposed to unsolicited material offensive to them.” Do we doubt that as the material becomes legally available “in private and in public” it also becomes generally available and soon can be claimed as ‘not offensive'? From this it can be argued that it is wanted by the people; that sexual immorality is ‘victimless' crime; that only the stupid oppose ‘progress'! Pornography, hard drugs, extreme violence, anarchy and sedition, can the plot be more clearly expressed? Can we honestly doubt that undermining public morals and the understanding of the importance of morality, is part of a plan for international cultural genocide? The 1988 quote makes the intent quite clear in the Australian setting and we know the same attitudes are being encouraged and indoctrinated world-wide? Remember gradualism! We are being socially engineered to moral decadence and mental incompetence. Our culture is now at a stage where there is a continual, socially traumatic and expensive pretence of taking action to repair the damage that the breakdown of social discipline and morality is causing. Globalisation creates the problems and then pretend, at our further cost, to be trying to fix them. * *Note: The gun laws that were said to have become necessary to control crime. But of course such laws do not (and did not) reduce crime, murder or suicide. Such laws only change the means of it because it is not the guns, the cars, the bombs or the knives; not the water of oceans or the sexuality of people: these are not the cause of immoral, or stupid or violent and undisciplined social behaviour. Removing guns from honest citizens encourages criminals because they will be the ones with guns and law favours the criminal rather than the victim. Fight-back and you are likely to be charged with a criminal offence. It also gives government freedom to introduce atrocious legislation because they feel more secure as they make it impossible for citizens to rebel against government. The outstanding cause of anti-social behaviour is, in our time, the deliberate corruption of the social foundations of human understanding – this is a corruption that has a clear intent and purpose – the degradation and annihilation of the greater part of world population. Yes social sedition aimed to overthrow your culture is now part of your social indoctrination in your country. It is deliberate! We must understand that party governments do not solve our problems – they (under world government direction) cause them! The purpose of unravelling our moral and economic social structure is to destroy community unity and community ability to resist Globalist take-over of our earth. Is the P & C infiltrated by traitors to humanity? Do you wonder just how many socially influential organisations; associations and groups are now actually run or controlled by their members? We have public meetings – few attend. We hear call for volunteers for executive positions – do you or I want the job of looking after our own interests? No, we vote for someone who offers, but do these kind people (often so well schooled in all the answers) really want to work in our service? Or are they there to push their own agenda? People who go out of their way to sacrifice themselves for others are not common; infiltration of organisations political parties and religions is easy. To this all-embracing social cancer, add a constant mass-media propaganda for violence and contempt for the discipline of moral values. Entertainment now contains constant propaganda for humanist ideology and political correctness. Can we doubt that the corruption and destruction of the human majority is pure and clean in the plans for the New World Order? See 2004 items on www.TheMindWeb.com Authorities then show such contempt for human need as to claim it a great mystery why young people (and now older) are behaving so irresponsibly. They should know – they help contrive it! No, it is not because these authorities (mostly parents themselves) don't care, it is because they do not care enough to face the horror of what they do. Pride of position, prejudice against opposition, the arrogance of self-righteousness – these enforcers of ideological fiction keep them blind – they prefer death to (what they see) as dishonour (though their first preference is to kill the messenger). We are all to blame! Our only saving grace is that "we know not what we do". Although our behaviour is what we must expect when life is confined to belief in the satisfaction of our animal instincts and the human potential is hidden, we should not forget the Biblical 'millstone around the neck' of those who lead children astray. We should also not forget that we have human intelligence and human feelings; we have the capacity of caring what we do and doing what we care. Taking responsibility for our own governing is cheaper and easier than today's political elections; we can do it if we only care enough to think for ourselves. Few of those pushing ideology from influential positions will have the courage to face that they themselves are the cause of most suicides, crimes, accidents and the general social problems of the undisciplined young. Girls have been misled and boys have been encouraged to think education unmanly; a large and increasing part of each generation is wasted: what a responsibility to face. How many parents will, when their child gets into trouble, blame everyone and everything rather than the new ideology of raising children with a love that is too selfish to instil discipline. Today's parents call for ‘better' education; what has made them so self-indulgent that they fail to see that it is their new social values that destroy their children? True love puts the child's best interests first. The child disciplined to responsible social behaviour has an obvious survival advantage, will be most comfortable with family and strangers, and enjoy more satisfaction of success. Had the effort that was put into persuading parents that children should be allowed to do as they like been put into understanding effective discipline, so many young lives would have been saved. Our best life-saver is discipline that does not increase the mental trauma as does non-physical discipline! The creation of life follows a logical rather than random pattern. Life shows a pattern of intelligent planned development; it may be mysterious but it is not magical. Religion may suggest a God of magic but all true creation is a creation of order – a discipline of energy – a design for purpose. Download Of TRUTH to uncover more about Christian truth. God did not decide, arbitrarily, how He wanted us to live! He advised us of how we should live to get the best results from the order in which we exist. We were given an instruction book to go with our life-form. Creation by intelligence is not challenged by science or taught by educators – but it is constantly ignored or ridiculed. To be ignored sends out a very powerful message to the general public – what is ignored by the mass media cannot possibly be of any importance and ridicule is gleefully accepted as it promotes feelings of superiority. This is why they can tell us some truth but we ignore it. When they want us to take notice they MAKE SURE WE BELIEVE IT IS IMPORTANT – they remind us over and over – every mass media. Who in Australia could ignore the Sydney Olympics? How few thought the games were not of great social importance? Did the games advance humanity – civilisation – understanding – communal welfare? Not a step! Did the games help remove us from our enslavement? Not an inch! They tell us we are educated to think for ourselves – THEY LIE! Yes THEY LIE – they TEACH us LIES and they ENCOURAGE confusion. Surely we can see this, and see why Globalists want us sick, drug addicted, confused, financially poor, divided and helpless – surely we can see, over many years, the truth reflected from their actions and that only one ending can result from the fulfilment of their design. I repeat: Human life has never had better opportunities but, is the world becoming filled with violence, misery, futility, frustration and selfish greed because people are making life decisions on a basis of false beliefs? I can see it! I have done the research, if I am wrong – show me. - Contents Chapter 11: The people of many countries have a political right to choose their own representatives; is it not strange that all are becoming subject to the same attitudes and behaviour without consultation or any community planning? Although the referendum for changing Australia, officially, to a republic, was soundly defeated, the greed for power did not end. One way to make sure that this greed is not rewarded is to show that we can have the kind of democratic republic we want without losing the advantages won by generations of struggle and suffering. Generations that gave us the benefits our legal "Monarchical Republic" now offers for our choice. A serious, legally binding preamble, is a good place for understanding to start. The point is that, if we see that we can have what we want legally, and without the dangers of making despotism legal, then the agents of Globalist slavery may not, so easily, persuade us otherwise. A nation is entitled to a precise and protective preamble! A statement of where we come from and the ideals, principles and values we aim to achieve – and which law-makers MUST take into account. Of various political offerings a Labor version starts off in the right direction but thereafter offers no security. I accept this opening sentence of an improved Constitution preamble proposed by the Australian Labor party; quote: “ Having come together in 1901 as a Federation under the British Crown relying on the blessing of almighty God, we, the people of the Commonwealth of Australia, being now a sovereign democracy of people drawn from a world-wide ancestry, proclaim our independence and unity” . End quote. (On that introduction let us now build a responsible preamble.) Note: A National Constitution is the foundation of all our laws and the preamble should be a simple statement of principle that is binding in both the creation and enforcement of our laws. I am not suggesting any activity to force present government to adopt this: or to start any new political party. Nor do I imply that given the present system of government this preamble would be respected even if adopted. It will only be respected when the people accept their responsibility to govern themselves and choose their own electorate representatives as is, at present, our legal and Constitutional obligation. The point of it is that if people understand that they can have something better then perhaps they will never be tricked to vote for something worse. Given time, we may come to understand that we can take up our rightful role as the true power of government and no longer be slaves and beggars. Political parties will never approve of the above because it binds them clearly to a high and improving moral standard that the law must support as being the national intents and ideals when interpreting our Constitution; this would destroy them. Naturally the "politically correct" mass media will be reluctant to give public exposure to anything that may be dangerous to Globalism; the evidence may be vigorously, even violently, denied, should it happen that the truth cannot be contained with mass media silence. - Contents Chapter 12: A sample quote: this from Mr. Lloyd George (prominent British Liberal statesman and Prime Minister), referring to the peace negotiations following World War 1. (1914-18). Quote: Governments bow to the great prostitution of global commerce and finance! * Why? Do they not know that if they exposed these crimes to the public they could arrest the criminals and their supporters, and confiscate their illegally gained assets? Do governments hesitate because they see themselves as co-conspirators and expect to share in the loot, or because they are too incompetent to understand the plans of their advisers? In most cases it is because they were chosen for their pride, greed and incompetence. They serve those who offer them an image of power and importance! Is it not obvious that if they need instruction they could ask the people they pretend to represent – I am sure that if they told the people the truth and asked them what to do, they would quickly, and in no uncertain terms, be told! Any global business that the establishment does not now own or directly control will fear to upset the financial ‘city'. We may feel that to try to fight this power is useless. That is what ‘they' want us to think. It is in the nature of things that, even if it proves that the people cannot bring themselves to do their moral duty, then, in the end, corruption will create its own downfall. However, leaving the cancer to kill the host civilisation and therefore itself, will have horrendous consequences for the peoples of the world. No matter how much pain it may cause to destroy the cancer this is by far the best – only then can a new civilisation grow with understanding that will ensure that this cancer does not recur. *Note: If you think that the great prostitution of global finance and commerce is a secure and moral system may I suggest, as a matter of interest, you read "REVELATIONS" 17: 15 to 18:24. I doubt you will need any interpretation to help you now you have the clue as to what the Great Whore (the great city of Babylon) represents. Were education not under the direction of global interests, educators may well have understood this years ago. My quotes are from The New English Bible New Testament. This may suffer many of the faults of other translations but, being written in modern English, should be a easier to understand. Our best chance of escaping the panic, rioting, anarchy and the mass death and destruction that will follow a world-wide economic collapse and the effects of this on a misled, dependent, confused, and trusting population, is to move first in spreading understanding that will call the system to account. - Contents Postscript: This item only came to my attention as I was preparing to sign off on this treatise; it could not be ignored. It makes a very fitting end-piece but, first let me remind you, that the McMurtry article is copyright. Permission to reproduce is granted if accompanied by: The quotes are from “A Manifesto of Corporate Totalitarianism” by John McMurtry, Professor of Philosophy at the University of Guelph, He is here commenting on British PM Tony Blair speaking about Corporate Globalisation. John McMurtry comment; quote: “One might think that Blair's statement is a rhetorical conceit. But is it, in truth, the missing key to every act of his office? What act in his record is inconsistent with any part of it? When has Blair, or Chretien or Clinton, ever not acted in conformity to this belief in inevitable corporate globalization – "waiting for no one and no nation,” trampling all who do not jump into line with its omnipotent advance.” “They are not, in fact, national leaders, but obedient expressions of these forces of corporate globalization. Once we understand that, we see into the directive logic of current historical events ... We can identify the defining features of this new order's authority by diagnosis of Blair's own words. “(1) The forces of corporate global restructuring are without meaning or value in their direction. For they are external "forces" not what we care about intrinsically, and they "drive the future" as the forces of ... gravity move the tides. They are to be submitted to, not because they confer meaning or give us a moral direction, but because they are all-powerful and we cannot resist them. "(2) The forces of corporate global restructuring are lawless. They "don't stop at national boundaries," as all lawful agents are obliged to do. The first principle of domestic and international law, to respect the boundaries of others, is overridden by these forces as the destiny of the world's future. "(3) The forces of corporate global restructuring are unaccountable. There is no electorate or standard of behaviour or anything else that they answer to or have to answer to for their domination because "they wait for no-one and no nation" and "drive the future.” “(4) The forces of corporate global restructuring are nihilist. For they "respect no tradition" ethical, Legal, or cultural- and there is no exception. ... [Humanity is denied]. "As we unpack the inner meaning of Blair's representative statement, we need to ask what political leader has not acted in conformity to the demands of these transnational corporate forces? What "democratic" political or legal leadership yet seeks to make accountable, or hedge in by enforced law, or raise any other power above, or in any way morally question the transnational corporate agenda which these forces express? “The sad fact is that our leaders demand that we accept what they themselves describe as lawless and unaccountable...” . EQ. We who follow in some depth the political scene, surely know that the above is true; we have seen how they impose their cultural poison worldwide. The United Nations has for years been downgrading borders; confusing what is ethical, legal and cultural; mixing and confusing race to no rational or demonstrated humane purpose; destroying tradition; denying human discipline; encouraging unhealthy foods and lifestyles; instilling unnatural and antisocial standards of behaviour; allowing confidence trickery as financial practice; promoting belief that some crimes are victimless and misrepresenting what democracy means. This can have only one aim: shattering human values, creating confusion and dividing opposition. This, in turn, clearing the way for the "lawless and unaccountable" corporate take over we now call globalisation. 'Politically correct' enslavement has been promoted under the cloak of 'humanism'. Humanism is not human it is a deceiver's cloak. Who, in any party-governed country, among the leaders of state, church, law, education, entertainment or mass media has ever raised a persuasive voice in response to community complaint of political corruption? Or made any serious effort to resist Globalist mind subversion? How few have raised a finger; or lent an ear? Or tried to expose the lack of substance in ideology – fought against law that protects corporate crime – explained the democracy sham, or money scam, or warned of the corruption of community morals by education? On the other hand how prophetic was Professor Hayek “The Road to Serfdom” 1944, when he said; quote: “... many who think themselves infinitely superior to the aberrations of Nazism and sincerely hate all its manifestations, work at the same time for ideals whose realization would lead straight to the abhorred tyranny.” EQ. We are so close to the unthinkable; a despotic, arrogant, all-powerful world government that obeys no law and governs by its own decree. But are there signs the Globalists are worried? Why do they come into the open to have us told that Globalism is irresistible and inevitable; that it cannot and should not be fought? No social movement, especially one without morals, is either irresistible or inevitable. Every caring human has no moral choice other than to fight this corruption. The basic principles we are now being forced to live by are totally false – submission to a dictatorial World Government is a social madness! This IS a life/death WAR; will we sacrifice humanity to inhumanity? Read this evidence again – will we gamble animal selfishness against human life? One last quote; source unknown, "Those whom the gods would destroy they first make mad". Let us not surrender too soon; let us look to the source of our madness before we leap and then let us offer this evidence to others. *** Presented by www.themindweb.com - Contents |
